Nova
Originated From France
Request a Quote

Home/Resources/Importing & Compliance/Backflow Protection: DC vs RPZ

Importing & Compliance · explainer

Backflow Protection on the Incoming Main: EN 1717 Fluid Categories and Choosing Between a DC and an RPZ

A backflow preventer follows fluid category: the UK rates an RPZ to 4 and a double check to 3; category 5 needs an air gap. Cites EN 1717:2025+A1:2026.

The backflow preventer on a building’s incoming main is chosen by the fluid category downstream of it, and the pipe size has no say. Under the UK Regulators’ Specification, an RPZ (type BA, product standard EN 12729) is rated to fluid category 4 for both back pressure and back siphonage. A double check valve (DC, type EC or ED to EN 13959) is rated to category 3, a single check to category 2, and category 5 needs a type AA or AB air gap. A DC is enough when nothing past it exceeds category 3; category 4 takes an RPZ, and no RPZ covers category 5.

Many tender sheets still write “backflow protection to EN 1717:2000”. That edition is withdrawn, and the RPZ product standard was reissued in 2023. Below: the five categories, a four-question decision tree, the editions a certificate should cite, and what an RPZ commits the owner to after handover.

Key Takeaways

  • The device must be rated for the highest fluid category downstream of it, up to the next device (Water Supply (Water Fittings) Regulations 1999 (England & Wales), Schedule 2, paragraph 15(3); Scotland and NI have equivalents).
  • UK ratings: RPZ (BA) category 4; double check (EC, ED) and CA disconnector category 3; single check (EA, EB) category 2; AA and AB air gaps category 5.
  • At category 3 the UK and German practice part ways: the UK accepts a double check, while DIN EN 1717 practice pairs category 3 with a type CA, which the UK rates equally.
  • Current editions: EN 1717:2025+A1:2026, EN 12729:2023 and EN 13959:2004.
  • In the UK an RPZ needs the water undertaker’s consent at least 10 working days before work starts, and a test at least once a year.
  • IFANNova makes no RPZ or double check devices. We supply the pipe and brass isolating valves around them.
Water Regs UK explains backflow (YouTube).
Backflow - what it is and why it is an issue


Fluid categories decide the device, not the pipe size

Schedule 1 of the Water Supply (Water Fittings) Regulations 1999 (England & Wales) sets out five categories. Scotland (Water Supply (Water Fittings) (Scotland) Byelaws 2014) and Northern Ireland (Water Supply (Water Fittings) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2009) have their own instruments that use the same five-category scale. Category 1 is wholesome water from the undertaker’s main. The same water changed only in temperature, taste, odour or appearance is category 2, which is why hot water sits there.

Category 3 is a slight hazard from low-toxicity substances, and the law names ethylene glycol, copper sulphate and sodium hypochlorite. A significant hazard, such as pesticides or carcinogenic substances, is category 4. The top of the scale, category 5, is a serious hazard: pathogens, faecal material, radioactive or very toxic substances. Only an air gap answers it, and a type AA gap is no less than 20 mm or twice the supply’s internal diameter, whichever is greater.

The rule that turns this into a purchase sits in Schedule 2, paragraph 15(3): the device must suit the highest category downstream of it before the next device. One dosing pot behind the main is enough to move the whole supply up a category unless that pot has its own protection at the point of use.

Minimum device by fluid category: UK rating against German DIN EN 1717 practice.
Fluid category Typical source UK minimum device DIN EN 1717 practice Verdict for the main
Category 2 Hot water, plain sprinkler branch Single check, EA or EB Verifiable single check, EA Single check; no RPZ needed
Category 3 Glycol heating, hypochlorite dosing Double check EC or ED, or CA Backflow preventer, CA DC is the UK default; CA equally rated, Germany’s default
Category 4 Pesticides, inhibitor-dosed sprinklers RPZ, BA RPZ, BA RPZ, with consent and annual tests
Category 5 Pathogens, faecal or animal waste Air gap AA or AB Air gap AA or AB Break tank; no valve qualifies

Source: UK column, Regulators’ Specification as published by Water Regs UK; German column, the SYR drinking-water protection brochure (DIN EN 1717 with DIN 1988-100). Category 1 needs no device.

Whichever device the category calls for, it needs isolating valves directly upstream and downstream so the tester can shut it in. For contractors assembling that valve set on the incoming main, our brass ball and gate valves run from 1/2″ to 4″. They isolate; they are not backflow devices.

Highest fluid category each backflow device is rated for, UK Regulators’ Specification0123455AA air gap5AB air gap4BA (RPZ)3CAdisconnector3EC doublecheck3ED doublecheck2EA singlecheck2EB singlecheckAir gaps (fluid category)Mechanical devices (fluid category)Highest fluid category rated
Only an air gap reaches category 5, and the RPZ (BA) is the only valve on the scale rated to category 4. Every double check and the CA stop at 3, so one category 4 source past the main moves the whole answer from a DC to an RPZ. Each device carries the same rating for back pressure and back siphonage. Method: UK Regulators’ Specification ratings as reproduced by Water Regs UK (backflow-protection topic), read 27 September 2026; each device listed is rated equally for back pressure and back siphonage, so one bar per device.
Highest fluid category each backflow device is rated for, UK Regulators’ Specification. Source and method: UK Regulators’ Specification ratings as reproduced by Water Regs UK (backflow-protection topic), read 27 September 2026; each device listed is rated equally for back pressure and back siphonage, so one bar per device.
Device type Air gaps (fluid category) Mechanical devices (fluid category)
AA air gap 5 —
AB air gap 5 —
BA (RPZ) — 4
CA disconnector — 3
EC double check — 3
ED double check — 3
EA single check — 2
EB single check — 2

DC or RPZ: a four-question decision tree

Walk the questions from the top, because the most severe category downstream settles the answer and the lower ones stop mattering.

  1. Is there any category 5 source past the main without its own air gap? Then no valve will do. Mechanical devices seal with moving parts, and microorganisms can grow back through them against the flow, so the answer is a type AA or AB air gap, usually a break tank.
  2. Is there any category 4 source? Fit an RPZ. Kemper’s guide to DIN EN 1717 puts the line between categories 3 and 4 at an oral LD50 of 200 mg/kg body weight, read from the chemical’s safety data sheet. When in doubt, it advises the category 4 device.
  3. Is the worst source category 3? In the UK a double check (EC or ED) or a CA is acceptable. On a project designed to German practice, plan for a CA.
  4. Is everything past the main category 2 or better? A single check (EA) meets the rating.

The boiler room is where this goes wrong. The England & Wales regulations name ethylene glycol as a category 3 substance, so a glycol-filled heating fill point can sit behind a double check. Kemper lists a heating fill point with inhibitors as a category 4 example under DIN EN 1717. The same plant room can land one category apart on either side of the Channel, so read the dosing chemical’s data sheet and compare its oral LD50 with the 200 mg/kg line before you size anything. Sprinklers follow the same logic: Water Regs UK treats a plain-water sprinkler branch as typically category 2, and one dosed with a rust inhibitor as typically category 4.

Backflow device decision tree for a building water service1Any category 5 source withoutits own air gap?YesAir gap, type AA or AB (usually abreak tank). No valve qualifies.No2Any category 4 source?YesRPZ, type BA to EN 12729:2023, withundertaker consent and annual tests.No3Is the worst source category 3?YesUK: double check EC or ED, or a CA.German practice: plan for a CA.No4Is everything past the maincategory 2 or better?YesSingle check, type EA or EB.
Read from the top: the most severe category downstream decides the device, so one category 4 source makes it an RPZ however clean the rest of the building is. UK ratings per the Regulators’ Specification; the category 3 branch is where German DIN EN 1717 practice differs.

Which edition the certificate should cite in 2026

EN 1717 sets the method: classify the fluid, then pick a device family. Its current text is EN 1717:2025+A1:2026, adopted in Germany as DIN EN 1717:2026-08; the 2000 edition is withdrawn. The device standards sit underneath it. EN 12729:2023 replaced the 2002 edition for the BA. EN 13959:2004 is still current for check valves.

Standard editions to cite on a backflow schedule, status as of September 2026.
Standard (current edition) Covers Size range (DN) Pressure class (PN) Replaces
EN 1717:2025+A1:2026 Fluid categories, device selection Not a product standard Not applicable EN 1717:2000 (withdrawn)
EN 12729:2023 RPZ, family B type A (BA) 6 to 250 10 EN 12729:2002
EN 13959:2004 Check valves EA, EB, EC, ED 6 to 250 10 Still current

Source: BSI Knowledge and SIS status records, DIN Media, read 27 September 2026.

Two scope limits matter on a schedule. EN 12729:2023 covers PN 10 devices rated for 65 °C permanent duty and 90 °C for up to one hour. A BA on a hot supply needs its maker’s rating checked against the flow temperature. EN 13959 check valves above DN 50 are for horizontal installation only, which rules out a vertical riser position on larger mains. A certificate dated before 2023 for an RPZ is not wrong by itself, but ask whether the device has been assessed to the current edition.

A schedule line that survives review names all three layers: the category, the device type and the product standard with its year. Here is a worked example:

Incoming main, fluid category 4 downstream. Type BA to EN 12729:2023, DN 50, isolating valves either side, relief discharge to a type AA air gap. Selection per EN 1717:2025+A1:2026.

A line that says only “backflow preventer” leaves the category decision to whoever buys the valve.

What an RPZ on the incoming main commits the owner to

An RPZ is a maintenance contract as much as a valve. Under paragraph 15(4) the England & Wales regulations already require protection on the supply pipe where premises are separately occupied or where the undertaker serves notice. Water Regs UK adds that where high-risk contaminants are likely, the undertaker can ask for zone or whole-site protection on top of point-of-use devices. An RPZ may be accepted for that whole-site role up to category 4.

Before an RPZ goes on the main, check whether the one category 4 source can be protected where it is used. An RPZ on the chemical line alone can leave the main at a double check, and the annual test then covers one small device rather than the whole supply. The undertaker still decides whether whole-site protection is required, so put that question to it in the same notification.

From the RPZ guidance, five obligations follow in the UK:

  • The RPZ AIM, the water undertakers’ installation and test method, has been in force since 1 January 2025. An RPZ counts as protection only if it is installed and tested to it.
  • The proposal reaches the undertaker at least 10 working days before work starts. Consent is conditional on commissioning and ongoing tests.
  • Test intervals are set by the undertaker and are at least annual. An annual test can be done no earlier than 30 days before its due date.
  • Before the end of 2026, RPZ testers must renew their qualification for their test certificates to be accepted.
  • A missed test can lead the undertaker to disconnect the supply temporarily and require the valve’s removal.

The plant room has to accept the device too. The relief outlet of a BA or CA must discharge through an air gap that satisfies type AA, so a floor drain sized for the discharge belongs on the drawing. One manufacturer’s BA opens its relief valve at a 140 hPa (0.14 bar) difference between inlet and middle zones, and the test ports need shut-off valves directly upstream and downstream.

Reduced pressure zone backflow preventer on a copper supply pipe with a brass lever isolating ball valve directly upstream and downstream, test cocks on the body, and the relief outlet ending above a funnel tundish with a visible air gap before the floor drain
What the plant room has to provide around an RPZ: an isolating valve directly either side so the tester can shut it in, and a relief outlet that discharges through a type AA air gap to a drain sized for the discharge. (Illustration.)

When a check valve counts as backflow protection

The name on the valve does not settle it. Water Regs UK is explicit. A check valve or non-return valve provides backflow protection only if it conforms to BS EN 13959, or passes all of the Regulators’ Specification tests for a single or double check, endurance tests included. A generic swing check on the drawing is not your category 2 device.

That applies to our own range. Our brass check valves, 1/2″ to 4″, are non-return valves. They carry no EN 13959 or EN 12729 certification, so they are not a rated backflow device, and we make no RPZ or double check devices. Where we fit is the rest of the incoming service. That means the isolating valves either side of the certified device and the pipe after it, such as PP-R pipe and fittings in PN20, 20, 25 and 32 mm.

For the certified device, ask the supplier for three things: the EN 12729:2023 or EN 13959 certificate for that exact reference and DN, the maker’s temperature rating, and the plant-departure date. Set that date against your notification date, because the RPZ cannot go in before the undertaker has had its 10 working days. We publish no standing lead time; ask us for the plant-departure date on the valves and pipe against the same programme. For how these lines sit in a tender, see our guide to tender documents for pipe supply; hot-water outlets further down the same system are covered in our TMV specification guide.

Conclusion

The risk sits in the category you did not look for. A double check on the main is compliant in the UK only while everything past it stays at category 3 or better, and one inhibitor dose or chemical line added later can void it. Classify every downstream source before choosing the device, cite EN 1717:2025+A1:2026, EN 12729:2023 and EN 13959:2004, and budget an RPZ’s annual test with the valve.

Written by the IFANNova Technical Team (Engineering & Export), from the Water Supply (Water Fittings) Regulations 1999, Water Regs UK guidance, BSI and DIN Media status records and the manufacturer sources cited above.

Reviewed 27 September 2026. IFANNova is a French-designed, European-standard piping brand. It makes no RPZ, CA or EN 13959 check valves, and no lead-time figure is stated because none is held.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between an RPZ and a double check valve?

An RPZ (type BA) has a relief valve that vents its middle zone to atmosphere, and the UK rates it to fluid category 4. A double check (type EC or ED) has two check valves and no relief, and the UK rates it to category 3.

What is fluid category 5?

Fluid representing a serious health hazard from pathogens, radioactive or very toxic substances, such as faecal material or animal waste. No valve is accepted for it; it needs a type AA or AB air gap.

How often does an RPZ need testing?

In the UK, at intervals set by the water undertaker and at least once a year, by a competent tester working to the RPZ AIM. Before the end of 2026 testers must renew their qualification for certificates to be accepted.

Is EN 1717:2000 still valid?

No. It has been withdrawn; the current text is EN 1717:2025+A1:2026, adopted in Germany as DIN EN 1717:2026-08. The RPZ product standard is EN 12729:2023.