If you are looking for the standard length of PPR pipe in a standard, there isn’t one. ISO 15874-2:2013, the product standard for PP-R pipes, contains no delivery-length requirement: its geometrical clause 6.2 “Dimensions of pipes” covers only 6.2.1 outside diameters and 6.2.2 wall thicknesses with tolerances. The general part, ISO 15874-1:2013, is the same — “length” appears only inside diameter definitions, such as mean outside diameter being the measured outer circumference divided by π.
Commercially that means one thing: the length of your PPR pipe is a contract term, not a compliance point. Writing “lengths to ISO 15874” on a purchase order buys you nothing; you have to state the length you want.
IFANNova PPR pipe is supplied in 4 m lengths in 20 × 2.8, 25 × 3.5 and 32 × 4.4 mm, and our UPVC 806 pressure pipe in 4 m lengths across Φ20 × 2.0 to Φ110 × 7.2 (per our catalogue). That 4 m figure is not a compromise — as the container arithmetic below shows, it is the length that fits a 20 ft box. This page covers length, packing and container loading only; for the diameter, SDR, PN and wall-thickness side of a specification, see our pipe sizing charts.

The 6 m figure is real, but it belongs to a different material and a different standard from the one it usually gets attributed to.
The genuine source is ISO 1452-2:2009 clause 6.5, covering PVC-U pressure pipe: “The nominal pipe length, l, shall be a minimum length which does not include the depth of the socketed portions… NOTE The preferred nominal length of pipe is 6 m. Other lengths are subject to agreement between the manufacturer and the purchaser.” Two things in that sentence are routinely missed, and the next section deals with both.
The false source is ISO 161-1, cited across supplier datasheets, tender documents and sourcing blogs as the origin of the “6 m standard length”. ISO 161-1:2018 has no length clause anywhere — its complete clause list runs 4 Nominal outside diameter, 5 Nominal pressure rating (PN), 6 Minimum required strength (MRS).
| Standard (version) | Does it specify pipe length? | What it actually contains on this point |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 1452-2:2009 (PVC-U pressure) | Yes, as a preference | Cl. 6.5: nominal length l is a minimum, excluding socket depth. Preferred nominal length 6 m; other lengths by agreement between manufacturer and purchaser. |
| ISO 15874-2:2013 (PP-R pipes) | No | Cl. 6.2 covers outside diameters (6.2.1) and wall thicknesses with tolerances (6.2.2) only. No length requirement exists. |
| ISO 15874-1:2013 (PP-R general) | No | “Length” appears only within diameter definitions (e.g. circumference ÷ π). Not a delivery term. |
| ISO 161-1:2018 | No — commonly miscited | Clauses 4, 5, 6 = nominal outside diameter, PN rating, MRS. No length clause anywhere in the standard. |
| ISO 4435:2003 (PVC-U non-pressure drainage/sewer) | No fixed value — defers to manufacturer | Cl. 6.2.3: effective length l “shall be not less than that specified by the manufacturer when measured as shown in Figure 1.” |
Buying implication (our view as a supplier, not a standards requirement): a tender clause reading “6 m lengths to ISO 161” is unenforceable as written, because the referenced standard is silent on length. Get it rewritten as a plain contractual length before award, or you have no basis to reject a short delivery.
The two length clauses that do exist — ISO 1452-2:2009 cl. 6.5 for PVC-U pressure pipe and ISO 4435:2003 cl. 6.2.3 for drainage — define length the same careful way, and it is not how most buyers count.
It is a minimum, not a target. ISO 1452-2:2009 cl. 6.5 says the nominal length “shall be a minimum length”. Pipe delivered slightly over is conforming; pipe delivered under is not. The tolerance is one-sided by design.
It excludes the socket, and this is the one that costs money. The same clause states the nominal length “does not include the depth of the socketed portions”. ISO 4435:2003 makes the same exclusion visually, its Figure 1 showing effective length measured on single-socket, ring-seal and plain-ended pipe with the socket outside the measurement.
That opens a gap between laid length and overall length on socketed pipe, with two effects worth stating on a purchase order:
IFANNova PPR and UPVC pressure pipe is supplied plain-ended at 4 m, jointed through the separate 1138 (PPR, 75 items) and 1806 (UPVC, 203 items including ball valves and solvent cement) fitting series (per our catalogue). Plain ends remove the ambiguity: nominal and overall length are the same number, so take-off and stowage use one figure.
Because the PP-R standard sets no length, the real market data is what manufacturers publish. Two independent published examples, one for PP-R and one for PVC:
| Source | Material | Published length | Diameters covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georg Fischer AQUASYSTEM PP-R Pipe datasheet (valid from 12/30/24) | PP-R, SDR 6 / PN20, to EN ISO 15874 and DIN 8077/8078 | L = 4 m for every diameter listed | d20, d25, d32, d40, d50, d63, d75, d90, d110 |
| Vinidex, PVC Pressure Pipe Standards (technical resource) | PVC pressure pipe | “The standard effective length of PVC pipes is 6 m although other lengths, up to 12 m, may also be available.” | Not diameter-specific in the quoted text |
| IFANNova PPR 1103 (per our catalogue) | PPR PN20 | 4 m per length | 20 × 2.8, 25 × 3.5, 32 × 4.4 mm only. Above 32 mm: Coming soon |
| IFANNova UPVC 806 / WP55 (per our catalogue) | UPVC PN16 | 4 m per length | Φ20 × 2.0 to Φ110 × 7.2 |
The Georg Fischer row settles an argument that recurs in tender clarifications. GF is a European manufacturer publishing to EN ISO 15874 and DIN 8077/8078, and it ships 4 m at every diameter from d20 through d110 — so 4 m PP-R is neither a small-diameter-only convention nor a shortcut. If a consultant challenges 4 m as non-standard, the accurate reply is that the PP-R standard specifies no length at all, and 4 m is the published length of a major European brand.
For HDPE, our pipe is marked “GERMANY STANDARD DIN8077/8078” and runs Φ20 × 2.3 to Φ110 × 10 (per our catalogue). Coil versus straight-length supply, and coil lengths per diameter: Coming soon — we will not publish a coil figure we cannot substantiate from our catalogue.
This is the section that changes purchase orders, and it comes down to 133 mm. ISO 668:2020 Table 3 sets minimum internal dimensions for series 1 freight containers: for the 20 ft, 8’6″ box (1CC) the minimum internal length is 5,867 mm; for the 40 ft, 8’6″ (1AA) and the 40 ft high cube (1AAA) it is 11,998 mm. Door openings on the 1CC and 1AA are 2,261 mm high × 2,286 mm wide, with the 1AAA high cube taller at 2,566 mm high × 2,286 mm wide. Against the two candidate pipe lengths:
| Container (ISO 668:2020 type) | Minimum internal length (ISO 668:2020, Table 3) | 4 m pipe | 6 m pipe |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 ft, 8’6″ — 1CC | 5,867 mm | Fits. One length per row, 5,867 − 4,000 = 1,867 mm spare | Does not fit. 6,000 mm exceeds the 5,867 mm minimum internal length |
| 40 ft, 8’6″ — 1AA | 11,998 mm | Fits, two per row end-to-end (8,000 mm) | Two per row = 12,000 mm vs 11,998 mm minimum — marginal on the ISO floor |
| 40 ft high cube — 1AAA | 11,998 mm (door opening 2,566 mm high) | Fits, two per row | Same marginal case on length; the gain is height, not length |
The 20 ft conclusion is hard, not marginal. A 6 m pipe is 133 mm longer than the ISO minimum internal length of a 20 ft container, so it cannot be loaded. That is our calculation from two published figures — the ISO 668:2020 Table 3 minimum and a 6,000 mm stick — not a sourced packing fact.
The 40 ft case carries a caveat. Two 6 m pipes end-to-end make 12,000 mm against an ISO minimum of 11,998 mm — a 2 mm shortfall, which makes this a marginal case rather than a hard exclusion. In practice 6 m pipe does ship in 40 ft containers because real units are built longer than the minimum, with practical interiors commonly quoted around 12.02–12.03 m. But that stow depends on the actual unit exceeding the ISO minimum, which ISO does not guarantee — ISO 668:2020 states its table figures are minimums and defers to ISO 1496 as authoritative for internal dimensions.
For volume and weight planning, forwarder-published figures are indicative only and vary by build series — never treat them as ISO values. Typical internal dimensions run 5.89 × 2.35 × 2.39 m (~33 m³) for a 20 ft and 12.02 × 2.35 × 2.39 m (~67 m³) for a 40 ft standard, with the 40 ft high cube at 12.025 × 2.352 × 2.585 m (~76 m³) (Freightos; iContainers). The iContainers source attaches its own warning to payload figures, which we repeat: “Always confirm weight limits with your freight forwarder or carrier, as road and port regulations can affect allowable limits.” The rating side is authoritative in ISO 668:2020 Table 2 — maximum gross mass R = 30,480 kg (67,200 lb) for 1A, 1AA, 1AAA, 1C, 1CC and 1CCC, with up to 36,000 kg permitted where the container is tested and marked to its actual rating.
What this means for the 4 m decision, as our commercial view: 4 m pipe is the only one of the two lengths that leaves you a free choice of box. It loads a 20 ft, and it loads a 40 ft two-per-row with 4 m spare for fittings cartons or a shorter product. 6 m pipe removes the 20 ft entirely — and for a buyer whose volume is a 20 ft, which describes many first and replenishment orders, that is the difference between shipping alone and consolidating with someone else’s cargo.
Pipe is hollow, and that fact governs how it is billed. Air and sea both charge on whichever is greater, weight or volume. IATA states the air rule directly: “To determine the volumetric rate, the general rule is to divide the volume of the shipment in cubic centimeters by 6000” — volumetric kg = (L × W × H in cm) ÷ 6,000 on outer package dimensions — and “Whichever is higher, the volumetric weight or actual weight, that is the amount that will be used for pricing the air freight cost.” For LCL ocean freight, the equivalent is the W/M revenue ton: chargeable W/M = max(CBM, gross weight in tonnes), one revenue ton being 1 m³ or 1,000 kg, whichever is greater. That source’s worked example bills 1.20 CBM against 0.65 t on 1.20 W/M, i.e. on volume. FCL is the exception, priced per box — you pay for space whether or not you fill it.
IATA illustrates the principle memorably: “a metric ton of feathers would be more costly than a metric ton of steel, as its volumetric weight would be very high.” A PPR or UPVC length is mostly enclosed air, so the volume side almost always sets the bill.
The consequence: freight on pipe is bought by the cubic metre, so anything that removes air removes cost. That is why nesting smaller-diameter pipe inside larger bores cuts the freight component — the same metres travel in fewer cubic metres. We state that as a principle rather than attaching a percentage: nesting ratios vary by diameter combination and restraint method, and we found no standards-body, association or manufacturer source publishing them. Our own range, Φ20 through Φ110 (per our catalogue), offers several workable nesting pairs.
How pipe is blocked and stacked determines whether it arrives straight. The one set of published rules we could verify comes from Vinidex’s PVC handling and storage guidance, and it is specific enough to write into a packing instruction:
Two scope notes. That guidance is published for PVC pipe, so we do not present it as a verified rule for PP-R or HDPE, though the logic of support spacing and load order is not material-specific. And the socket-alternation rule is the one that most obviously applies inside a container rather than in a yard — it stops a socketed stack rocking on its own high points. It is also a rule you do not need on plain-ended pipe, which is what we supply on PPR and UPVC (per our catalogue).
On bundling specifics there is a gap worth being honest about. Bundle sizes, strap counts, PE sleeving, pallets versus loose bulk stow, quantitative nesting ratios: we found no standards body, industry association or manufacturer source publishing these that we could open and verify. Nothing here is attributed to TEPPFA, and PPI’s bulk-pack terminology is not used, because neither source could be confirmed. Where the industry has no published rule, packing method is a negotiated term between you and your supplier — which brings us to what to ask for.
Because length and packing are contractual rather than standardised, they only get settled if you raise them. These six lines make a pipe enquiry answerable, and their absence is the most common reason a quotation goes back for a second round:
| What to state | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| 1. Required length, as a contract term | ISO 15874-2:2013 specifies no length for PP-R; ISO 1452-2:2009 cl. 6.5 makes 6 m a preference subject to agreement, not a requirement. Omit it and you get the manufacturer’s default with no basis to object |
| 2. Whether length is nominal/effective or overall | ISO 1452-2:2009 cl. 6.5 excludes socket depth; ISO 4435:2003 cl. 6.2.3 measures effective length per its Figure 1. Omit it and take-off and stowage plans disagree |
| 3. Container type you intend to load | 20 ft (1CC) minimum internal length is 5,867 mm per ISO 668:2020 Table 3 — below a 6 m stick, so a length can be agreed that cannot physically load your box |
| 4. Whether nesting is acceptable | Freight on pipe is billed on volume (IATA ÷6,000 for air; W/M revenue ton for LCL sea), so refusing nesting means paying to ship air |
| 5. Total metres per diameter, per material | Determines whether you are FCL (priced per box) or LCL (priced on max(CBM, tonnes)) — and therefore which length suits |
| 6. Storage duration at destination | The 1.5 m free stack height limit in the Vinidex guidance is tied to storage exceeding three months |
One filter to apply before you send it. Our pressure pipe stops at Φ110 and our PPR line at 32 mm (per our catalogue). In PVC 902 only the 1902 fittings reach Φ160 — the pipe stops at Φ110 — and the line is non-pressure drainage only, so it must not be specified for pressure duty. If your bill of quantities is built around DN 150–400 pressure mains, we cannot supply that portion, whatever the length. Tell us the split and we will quote the part we actually make.
Can I get 6 m PPR from you? Our PPR is 4 m (per our catalogue). Availability of other lengths: Coming soon — we will not quote a length we cannot confirm against current production.
Does a 40 ft high cube help with 6 m pipe? Not on length. The 1AAA minimum internal length is the same 11,998 mm as the 1AA per ISO 668:2020 Table 3; the high cube gains height (door opening 2,566 mm versus 2,261 mm). It buys stack height, not stick length.
How many pipes fit in a container? We do not publish a piece count. No authoritative source for pipes-per-container was found, and any such figure depends on bundle geometry, nesting, dunnage and the actual unit’s internal dimensions rather than the ISO minimums. Send your metres per diameter and we will work it as a calculation for your order.
Are your pipes made in France? No. IFANNova is a French brand; the pipe is manufactured by Zhuji Fengfan Piping in Zhuji, Zhejiang. Nothing in our range is made in France, and we would rather say so here than let you find out from a certificate of origin.
Length is the cheapest thing to get right before an order and one of the most expensive to discover after one. Send your metres per diameter, the container type you intend to load, and whether you can accept nested bundles — you will get a written answer against our actual 4 m range (per our catalogue), including a straight “no” where a size or a quantity sits outside what we make.
Not a sales pitch for cutting out the middleman.
Both routes are legitimate.
OEM keeps your design portable; ODM keeps the moulds with the factory.